Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:12 pm by sky_lark
1. I completely disagree. I like Bitfighter. If nobody's on, I'm not just going to leave and hope someone is on later. I'll sit in the game for a few minutes hoping someone will come on, and if not I can quit. This really sucks without bots.
Furthermore, sometimes I just like playing with bots. I realize I'm probably in the minority here, but I enjoy the challenge of wading through 10 bots to get to the flag. It's entertaining, humorous, and exciting. This really sucks without bots.
2. Well, you can stack the punishments. If they add 1k bots every 30s for 2x in a row, then the 3rd time they may have to wait 60s. And the 4th time they have to wait 120s. Bitfighter can be programmed to look out for this and scale the delays accordingly.
3. I agree with this. I don't think bots should be regulated by votes, at least to an extent. I could see value in a voting system, but as you pointed out it'd be hard to get around a couple guys being jerks and screwing over the majority numbers.
4. Could you rephrase this? Or maybe provide an example? I'm not sure I understand you.[/quote]
I appreciate your counter-points, amgine. You raised some good ideas. However, I still stand firmly by my argument. I enjoy playing solo with bots and I don't think that should be taken away as a method of combating spammers.